Sign Of Spring - By bbvn_1
Wish You A wonderful Weekend!
MMMMM I’m still drunk and STILL waiting for that mailbox icon to tell me I got stuff to read.. More than the very kind people that already sent me stuff!
(Do it. You know you wanna~~~~)
kk I took some Tylenol and have been drinking plent of water and i ate 2 whole bagels so I’m fine but still send my question I am very happy to answer them k love you g’night
On December 14 the FCC will vote on Commissioner Pai’s plan to repeal Title II rules. This week he tried to justify that decision with a “myth busting” explainer where he makes a lot of sweeping claims he doesn’t think you’ll fact check.
So let’s go through his big points:


These are the real facts. Before Title II, the internet was so “free and open” that…
In today’s media market where the same huge companies make and deliver content, Commissioner Pai wants us to trust that corporations won’t use their dominance to bury competitive content or services.

Here’s another claim Commissioner Pai doesn’t want you to fact check, but:

As we mentioned above, ISPs tried to interfere with the services their customers could access and courts had to step in to stop them.
The FCC tried to craft net neutrality rules in 2010 called the Open Internet Order but the ISPs sued and won. The courts told the FCC that the only way to guarantee a free and open internet was using their Title II authority. Without those protections, any of these things would be legal:
Repealing Title II would be like letting a car company own the roads and banning a competitor from the highways.

Let’s break this down: We won’t have fast lanes and slow lanes, we’ll have “priority access” and…non-priority access? Well gosh.
This week we co-signed a letter with more than 300 other companies—businesses Mr. Pai gleefully ignores—urging the FCC to retain the Title II internet protections. Now we need you.
Oh, also: that post about automatically unfollowing the #net neutrality tag—it’s not true. It’s really not. That’s not who we are. Whatever happened, we haven’t been able to reproduce it. We tried. A lot.
But if it were true—which it’s not, we feel compelled to say again—THAT’S EXACTLY WHY YOU SHOULD CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES and demand a free, open, and neutral internet.
sweetheart, i love you but you putting this BACK on my dash makes me want to murder you in your sleep